GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M295X vs 1080 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.5

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M295X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M295X  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M295X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Report a correction
Slightly better T-Rex score 4,707.39 vs 3,349.27 More than 40% better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,607 MHz vs 723 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 10,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better floating-point performance 8,228 GFLOPS vs 2,961.4 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 4,096 MB 2x more memory
Much higher pixel rate 102.8 GPixel/s vs 23.14 GPixel/s Around 4.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher texture rate 257.1 GTexel/s vs 92.5 GTexel/s More than 2.8x higher texture rate
Higher memory bandwidth 224.4 GB/s vs 160 GB/s More than 40% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Much higher metro: last light framerate 131.6 vs 42.6 More than 3x higher metro: last light framerate
More shading units 2,560 vs 2,048 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 160 vs 128 32 more texture mapping units
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,721.2 frames/s vs 1,429.52 frames/s More than 20% better ocean surface simulation score
Lower TDP 180W vs 250W Around 30% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 1080

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
391.88 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080
685.15 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
80.43 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080
147.18 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
1,429.52 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
1,721.2 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
495.87 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1080
1,580.13 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M295X
4,707.39
GeForce GTX 1080
3,349.27

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus