Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M295X based on its .
See full details Radeon R9 M295X vs M290X |
Released November, 2014
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- 723 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7.6 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2015)4K gaming is something that AMD says is the best on the Fury X, thanks to it being "fueled by a 4096-bit high-bandwidth memory interface for extreme performance and power efficiency.
VS
Released January, 2014
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- 850 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M295X vs R9 M290X among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 4,707.39 | vs | 3,324.52 | More than 40% better T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 2,961.4 GFLOPS | vs | 2,304 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,280 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More compute units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more compute units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 92.5 GTexel/s | vs | 72 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 495.87 mInteraction/s | vs | 350.88 mInteraction/s | More than 40% better particle simulation score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 28.8 GPixel/s | vs | 23.14 GPixel/s | Around 25% higher pixel rate | |||
| Much lower TDP | 100W | vs | 250W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M295X vs M290X
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Thief
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $349 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
