Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M295X based on its .
See full details | Radeon R9 M295X vs M290X |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
3.9 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 4,707.39 | vs | 3,324.52 | More than 40% better T-Rex score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better floating-point performance | 2,961.4 GFLOPS | vs | 2,304 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,280 | 768 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
More compute units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more compute units | |||
Better particle simulation score | 495.87 mInteraction/s | vs | 350.88 mInteraction/s | More than 40% better particle simulation score | |||
Higher texture rate | 92.5 GTexel/s | vs | 72 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower TDP | 100W | vs | 250W | 2.5x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||