Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M360

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M360

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,360.46 vs 3,353.98 Almost the same
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 82.37 mHash/s More than 2x better bitcoin mining score
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 947.2 GFLOPS Around 50% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel/s Around 50% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,125 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 960M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
82.37 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
19.75 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
556.67 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
222.38 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
1.88 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
3.69 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
31.55 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
51.97 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
3,360.46
GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M360
3,719.28

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus