Radeon R9 M370X Mac vs Pro 460 |
Released May, 2015
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac
- 775 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
by Shawn-Baker (Sep, 2014)While many may argue that the human eye can't see over 24 FPS or 30 FPS, any true gamer will tell you that as we climb higher in Frames Per Second (FPS), the overall gameplay feels smoother.
VS
Released October, 2016
AMD Radeon Pro 460
- 850 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
by Ryan-Shrout (Mar, 2016)radiator is handling cooling for a pair of high-end GPUs.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the R9 M370X Mac Edition vs the Pro 460. | |||||||
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,863.7 GFLOPS | vs | 1,024 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 32 GTexel/s | More than 80% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 910 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| More compute units | 16 | vs | 10 | 6 more compute units | |||
| Slightly better particle simulation score | 313.56 mInteraction/s | vs | 213.51 mInteraction/s | More than 45% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,125 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
