Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M380

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M380

Report a correction
Significantly more memory 4,096 MB vs 1,024 MB 4x more memory
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,000 MHz 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,536 GFLOPS vs 833.3 GFLOPS Around 85% better floating-point performance
Better T-Rex score 2.62 frames/s vs 0.97 frames/s Around 2.8x better T-Rex score
Slightly higher pixel rate 16 GPixel/s vs 8.68 GPixel/s Around 85% higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,250 MHz 20% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 48 vs 32 16 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 755M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M Mac

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M380 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
193.9 mHash/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
19.14 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
35.81 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
10.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
569.22 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
393.81 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
235.44 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
143 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
2.62 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
0.97 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M380
48.62 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
18.79 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus