Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M385X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M385X

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,971.2 GFLOPS vs 1,404.2 GFLOPS More than 40% better floating-point performance
Better T-Rex score 3,357.65 vs 3,353.98 Almost the same
Higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 43.9 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
More shading units 896 vs 640 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 14,024 Around 70% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 14.8 fps More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 21.7 Around 45% higher metro: last light framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 32.4 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 1,100 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 960M

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M385X
3,357.65
GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Metro: Last Light

Comments

comments powered by Disqus