Radeon R9 M390X vs M290X |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M390X vs R9 M290X among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 8,449 | vs | 4,284 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 17,944 | vs | 6,817 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 40,697 | vs | 24,205 | Around 70% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 56.1 fps | vs | 22.8 fps | Around 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Much higher BioShock infinite framerate | 112.4 fps | vs | 46.8 fps | Around 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Significantly better manhattan score | 3,384.91 | vs | 2,047.22 | More than 65% better manhattan score | |||
| Much higher metro: last light framerate | 58.25 | vs | 33.1 | More than 75% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,961.4 GFLOPS | vs | 2,304 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 4,164 | vs | 2,527 | Around 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,280 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More compute units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more compute units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 92.5 GTexel/s | vs | 72 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better particle simulation score | 350.88 mInteraction/s | vs | 313.49 mInteraction/s | More than 10% better particle simulation score | |||
Report a correction
