Radeon R9 M390X vs M380 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 8,449 | vs | 3,047 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better manhattan score | 3,384.91 | vs | 480.07 | More than 7x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | vs | 96 GB/s | More than 65% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,961.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,536 GFLOPS | Around 95% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,048 | vs | 768 | 1280 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 4,164 | vs | 1,515 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 92.5 GTexel/s | vs | 48 GTexel/s | Around 95% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more compute units | 32 | vs | 12 | 20 more compute units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 23.14 GPixel/s | vs | 16 GPixel/s | Around 45% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 313.49 mInteraction/s | vs | 235.44 mInteraction/s | Around 35% better particle simulation score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,500 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M390X vs M380
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 960M vs R9 M380 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs R9 M380 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 M290X vs R9 M380 | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs R9 M380 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 980M vs R9 M390X | ||
 | VS | |
| Pro 570 vs R9 M390X | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 M395X vs R9 M390X | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 570 vs 1050 Ti | ||
