Radeon R9 M395X Mac vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,480 MHz | vs | 909 MHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s | vs | 174.7 GB/s | More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 11,340 GFLOPS | vs | 3,723 GFLOPS | More than 3x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 11,008 MHz | vs | 5,460 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly more memory | 11,264 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2.8x more memory | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | vs | 29.09 GPixel/s | More than 4.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 354.4 GTexel/s | vs | 116.4 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| Many more render output processors | 88 | vs | 32 | 56 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 2,048 | 1536 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 128 | 96 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R9 M395X Mac vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R9 M395X Mac | vs | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Amethyst | GP102 | |
| Clock speed | 909 MHz | 1,480 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 2,048 | 3,584 | |
| Texture mapping units | 128 | 224 | |
| Render output processors | 32 | 88 | |
| Pixel rate | 29.09 GPixel/s | 139.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 116.4 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,723 GFLOPS | 11,340 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon R9 M395X Mac | vs | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,365 MHz | 1,376 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 5,460 MHz | 11,008 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 352 bit | |
| Memory | 4,096 MB | 11,264 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.7 GB/s | 484.4 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 250W | 250W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
