Radeon R9 M395X Mac vs GeForce GTX TITAN |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 909 MHz | vs | 836 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | vs | 174.7 GB/s | More than 65% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Higher texture rate | 187.3 GTexel/s | vs | 116.4 GTexel/s | More than 60% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 128 | 96 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.8 GPixel/s | vs | 29.09 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 4,494 GFLOPS | vs | 3,723 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,460 MHz | More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 2,688 | vs | 2,048 | 640 more shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,365 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R9 M395X Mac vs GeForce GTX TITAN
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R9 M395X Mac | vs | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Amethyst | GK110 | |
| Market | Laptop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 909 MHz | 836 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 2,048 | 2,688 | |
| Texture mapping units | 128 | 224 | |
| Render output processors | 32 | 48 | |
| Pixel rate | 29.09 GPixel/s | 46.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 116.4 GTexel/s | 187.3 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,723 GFLOPS | 4,494 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon R9 M395X Mac | vs | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,365 MHz | 1,502 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 5,460 MHz | 6,008 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 256 bit | 384 bit | |
| Memory | 4,096 MB | 6,144 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.7 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 250W | 250W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
