GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M395X vs 1060 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.5

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1060

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M395X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Report a correction
More memory 8,192 MB vs 6,144 MB Around 35% more memory
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,280 768 more shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 80 48 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 723 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 8,686 vs 5,184 Around 70% better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 60% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 23.14 GPixel/s Around 3.2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 2,961.4 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 60% higher memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s vs 160 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 5,049 vs 2,310 Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 92.5 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Better T-Rex score 8.68 frames/s vs 5.72 frames/s More than 50% better T-Rex score
Significantly lower TDP 120W vs 250W 2.1x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
413.33 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
576.4 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
65.37 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
119.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
777.36 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,766.73 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
295.61 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,196.96 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
5.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.68 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
65.91 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
21.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
3,357.67
GeForce GTX 1060
3,358.86

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
3,562.09
GeForce GTX 1060
3,717.62

Comments

comments powered by Disqus