Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M395X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Report a correction
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 4,096 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 2,961.4 GFLOPS vs 2,368.5 GFLOPS More than 25% better floating-point performance
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,536 512 more shading units
Better particle simulation score 295.61 mInteraction/s vs 248.7 mInteraction/s Around 20% better particle simulation score
Front view of GeForce GTX 780M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 122W vs 250W 2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
413.33 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
126.58 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
65.37 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
30.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
777.36 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
1,002.2 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
295.61 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
248.7 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
5.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
3.26 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M395X
65.91 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
39.78 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus