0 Comments
| Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 Nano vs 980 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much wider memory bus | 4,096 bit | vs | 256 bit | 16x wider memory bus | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better floating-point performance | 8,192 GFLOPS | vs | 4,981 GFLOPS | Around 65% better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 256 GTexel/s | vs | 155.6 GTexel/s | Around 65% higher texture rate | |||
Many more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 2,048 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 128 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 3.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 77.82 GPixel/s | vs | 64 GPixel/s | More than 20% higher pixel rate |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R9 Nano
78.12
GeForce GTX 980
76.57
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R9 Nano
430.27
GeForce GTX 980
434.58
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R9 Nano
21.71
GeForce GTX 980
22.51
Battlefield 4
Radeon R9 Nano
100
GeForce GTX 980
93.4
Bioshock Infinite
Radeon R9 Nano
116
GeForce GTX 980
116.35
Crysis 3
Radeon R9 Nano
63.8
GeForce GTX 980
58.3
Metro: Last Light
GeForce GTX 980
83.5
Reviews Word on the street
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | GeForce GTX 980 | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 9.7 |
---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 25 comments.
Acnologia Zeref (08:37 PM, June 22, 2016)
Geek Gamer (02:36 PM, June 22, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (10:47 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (10:46 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (10:20 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (09:22 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (09:18 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (09:15 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (09:13 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (09:04 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (08:46 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (08:44 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (08:07 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (08:02 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:46 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:42 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:39 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:30 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (06:24 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (06:22 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (06:21 PM, February 5, 2016)
Acnologia Zeref (06:21 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:18 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:11 PM, February 5, 2016)
Niggir (06:10 PM, February 5, 2016)