GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 Nano vs R9 FURY among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.3

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 Nano  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 Nano

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 8,192 GFLOPS vs 7,168 GFLOPS Around 15% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 256 GTexel/s vs 224 GTexel/s Around 15% higher texture rate
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,584 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 224 32 more texture mapping units
More compute units 64 vs 56 8 more compute units
Significantly lower TDP 175W vs 275W More than 35% lower TDP
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate 96 vs 89 Around 10% higher metro: last light framerate
Front view of Radeon R9 FURY

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Report a correction
Slightly better sky diver factor score 441.66 vs 430.27 Around 5% better sky diver factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 Nano vs FURY

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Crysis 3

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
no, Nano is right on the spec by numbers and its a reference card, it hard to get most out of this card, just tailored for low power/high performance compact card. however, Fury (Fiji pro) is modifiable and there's a quite a lot of custom PCB around, with dual Bios setting means you might be (with luck) able to unlock a pure Fury X on Fury pro. Also Nano has 4 VRM and Fury Pro as 7 VRM for overclocking.
Since the Nano is outright superior at a similar pricepoint is AMD trying to kill the regular Fury?
comments powered by Disqus