GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 Nano vs R9 FURY among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R9 Nano
7.8
Radeon R9 FURY
7.9
Radeon RX 480
7.6
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R9 Nano
8.7
Radeon R9 FURY
6.9
Radeon RX 480
6.5
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R9 Nano
n.d.
Radeon R9 FURY
9.5
Radeon RX 480
8.7
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R9 Nano
8.1
Radeon R9 FURY
6.2
Radeon RX 480
7.8
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R9 Nano
n.d.
Radeon R9 FURY
n.d.
Radeon RX 480
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R9 Nano
7.7
Radeon R9 FURY
6.2
Radeon RX 480
8.1
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.3

Overall Score

Radeon R9 Nano
8.3
Radeon R9 FURY
7.5
Radeon RX 480
7.6

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 Nano  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Front view of Radeon R9 Nano
Front view of Radeon R9 FURY

AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 Nano

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 8,192 GFLOPS vs 7,168 GFLOPS Around 15% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 256 GTexel/s vs 224 GTexel/s Around 15% higher texture rate
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,584 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 224 32 more texture mapping units
More compute units 64 vs 56 8 more compute units
Significantly lower TDP 175W vs 275W More than 35% lower TDP
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate 96 vs 89 Around 10% higher metro: last light framerate
Front view of Radeon R9 FURY

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Report a correction
Slightly better sky diver factor score 441.66 vs 430.27 Around 5% better sky diver factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 Nano vs FURY

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 Nano
78.12
Radeon R9 FURY
80.31

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 Nano
430.27
Radeon R9 FURY
441.66

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 Nano
21.71
Radeon R9 FURY
21.49

Battlefield 4

Radeon R9 Nano
100
Radeon R9 FURY
101

Crysis 3

Radeon R9 Nano
63.8
Radeon R9 FURY
64.5

Metro: Last Light

Radeon R9 Nano
96
Radeon R9 FURY
89

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 Nano  vs FURY 
9.0
read review
9.2
read review

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Guest (09:40 PM, January 17, 2016)
no, Nano is right on the spec by numbers and its a reference card, it hard to get most out of this card, just tailored for low power/high performance compact card. however, Fury (Fiji pro) is modifiable and there's a quite a lot of custom PCB around, with dual Bios setting means you might be (with luck) able to unlock a pure Fury X on Fury pro. Also Nano has 4 VRM and Fury Pro as 7 VRM for overclocking.
Incognito Jay (06:55 PM, January 17, 2016)
Since the Nano is outright superior at a similar pricepoint is AMD trying to kill the regular Fury?
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss