GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 Nano vs R9 FURY X among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.5

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 Nano  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 Nano

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Report a correction
Much higher metro: last light framerate 96 vs 37 More than 2.5x higher metro: last light framerate
Significantly lower TDP 175W vs 275W More than 35% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 5% higher clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 8,602 GFLOPS vs 8,192 GFLOPS More than 5% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher texture rate 268.8 GTexel/s vs 256 GTexel/s More than 5% higher texture rate
Slightly higher pixel rate 67.2 GPixel/s vs 64 GPixel/s More than 5% higher pixel rate
Slightly better cloud gate factor score 22.45 vs 21.71 Around 5% better cloud gate factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 Nano vs FURY X

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus