Winner
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 Nano based on its noise and power.
See full details | Radeon R9 Nano vs FURY X |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much higher metro: last light framerate | 96 | vs | 37 | More than 2.5x higher metro: last light framerate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower TDP | 175W | vs | 275W | More than 35% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 5% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 8,602 GFLOPS | vs | 8,192 GFLOPS | More than 5% better floating-point performance | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 268.8 GTexel/s | vs | 256 GTexel/s | More than 5% higher texture rate | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 67.2 GPixel/s | vs | 64 GPixel/s | More than 5% higher pixel rate | |||
Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 22.45 | vs | 21.71 | Around 5% better cloud gate factor score |
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | FURY X | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 9.2 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||