Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 |
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2016)Performance (overclocking, power)80%Quality (build, design, cooling)80%General Features (display outputs, etc)80%Bundle, Packaging & Software80%Value for Money90% Overall TweakTown Rating82% The Bottom Line: SAPPHIRE's new Nitro Radeon RX 460 4GB is priced at just $139, nailing the 1080p gaming scene.
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.9 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050GPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Slightly more shading units | 896 | vs | 640 | 256 more shading units | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly more texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 40 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Slightly better video composition score | 77.54 frames/s | vs | 68.85 frames/s | Around 15% better video composition score | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | Around 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Slightly better fire strike factor score | 41.35 | vs | 35.49 | More than 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate | 44.5 | vs | 37.2 | Around 20% higher metro: last light framerate |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MX150 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 550 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 560 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
MX150 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RTX 2070 vs 1070 | ||