Winner
GeForce GTX 1070
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 1070 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 460 vs 1070 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Generic GeForce GTX 1070GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 150W | 2x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better PassMark score | 11,028 | vs | 4,329 | More than 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,506 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s | vs | 112 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 5,783 GFLOPS | vs | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | Around 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 96.4 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | More than 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 180.7 GTexel/s | vs | 67.2 GTexel/s | Around 2.8x higher texture rate | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 26,833.24 | vs | 3,717.16 | Around 7.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Many more render output processors | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more render output processors | |||
| Much better fire strike factor score | 87.79 | vs | 35.49 | Around 2.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,000 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,683 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 6,724 | vs | 2,488 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,920 | vs | 896 | 1024 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 120 | vs | 56 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much higher bioshock infinite framerate | 132.5 | vs | 55.3 | Around 2.5x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 1,727.43 frames/s | vs | 968.86 frames/s | Around 80% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,750 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 9 desktops with the Radeon RX 460, starting from $899
- 83 desktops with the GeForce GTX 1070, starting from $1,125
