Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8.5 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better video composition score | 77.54 frames/s | vs | 23.75 frames/s | More than 3.2x better video composition score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 1,376 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Much lower TDP | 75W | vs | 250W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much better PassMark score | 13,373 | vs | 4,329 | More than 3x better PassMark score | |||
Much higher memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s | vs | 112 GB/s | More than 4.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Much better floating-point performance | 11,340 GFLOPS | vs | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | More than 5.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Much more memory | 11,264 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 5.5x more memory | |||
Much higher pixel rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | Around 7.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,480 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much better manhattan score | 54,436.36 | vs | 3,717.16 | Around 14.8x better manhattan score | |||
Much higher texture rate | 354.4 GTexel/s | vs | 67.2 GTexel/s | More than 5.2x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 11,008 MHz | vs | 7,000 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Many more render output processors | 88 | vs | 16 | 72 more render output processors | |||
Many more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 896 | 2688 more shading units | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 56 | 168 more texture mapping units | |||
Much better cloud gate factor score | 26.47 | vs | 16.38 | More than 60% better cloud gate factor score | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 9,513 | vs | 2,488 | More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,582 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Wider memory bus | 352 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2.8x wider memory bus |