GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 460 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon RX 460
6.2
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.0
GeForce GTX 950
6.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon RX 460
7.1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.2
GeForce GTX 950
7.3
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon RX 460
6.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.2
GeForce GTX 950
6.6
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon RX 460
8.5
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.5
GeForce GTX 950
8.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon RX 460
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
n.d.
GeForce GTX 950
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon RX 460
9.5
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6
GeForce GTX 950
9.4
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
7.3

Overall Score

Radeon RX 460
7.3
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.1
GeForce GTX 950
7.3

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon RX 460

Front view of Radeon RX 460
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 460

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 460

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 5,400 MHz Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 112 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,150.4 GFLOPS vs 1,305.6 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher clock speed 1,090 MHz vs 1,020 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Higher texture rate 67.2 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel/s Around 65% higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 1,350 MHz Around 30% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 896 vs 640 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Higher turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 1,085 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 60W vs 75W 20% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
242.44 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
173.22 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
53.66 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
44.94 mPixels/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 460
35.49
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
33.8

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 460
275.3
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
255.03

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 460
16.38
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
17.81

Battlefield 4

Radeon RX 460
38.6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
35

Comments

Showing 15 comments.
Umut Cankaya (04:53 PM, June 26, 2017)
750 ti is winning because of more likes? really nigga?
whathappened (05:40 PM, December 27, 2016)
I was just curious and paired these 2 cards head to head, then scrolled down to the comments to confirm what I saw lol
aaron mendoza (06:33 PM, December 20, 2016)
wow this website is always extremely skewed in favor of nvidia this website is unreliable
agello24 (09:10 PM, November 16, 2016)
amd is working on a rx 470 SE to give the 750ti and the 950ti a bit of competition.
Balazs Voneki (01:43 PM, November 9, 2016)
Anybody use these cards with VGA analog to DVI adapter with no problem?
Savi0r (04:48 PM, October 16, 2016)
any ratings within .5 is no difference. rating has to be greater than .5 to actually have a difference.
reaper-death (08:49 PM, October 15, 2016)
The GTX 750 ti was gen 1 maxwell (DX 12 feature level 12_0).
Reaper (11:01 AM, October 15, 2016)
it rates rx 460 8.3 / 10 and 750ti 8.4 / 10
Matrac4 (08:08 PM, October 11, 2016)
No winner declared Too close to call WTF do you say?
Sebastian Jones (10:00 PM, October 1, 2016)
This is Kepler. If I had a dollar for each IQ point you have, I'd be in debt.
Imglidinhere (01:38 PM, September 15, 2016)
I find it sad how AMD only JUST reached 28nm Maxwell-level efficiency on a fabrication node that's literally half the size. xD That's just sad. Sorry, but GCN is hilariously inefficient. :P
Reaper (12:10 PM, September 7, 2016)
ok, wait, what ??? gtx 750ti win becuz of 10w lower power consumption ??? is it really that matter ?
Steve Bike (01:11 AM, September 1, 2016)
This isn't a real benchmark site obviously, it's just randomly generated with a lot of errors. Look at userbenchmarks.com for real results. People who own these gpu's go on and actually benchmark on there, then it puts the worst and best benchmark ratios together and compares them accurately. At the end of the day, these cards are pretty close, the 950 even edges out the 460. 460 is a sweeter deal because of crossfire imo even though crossfire sucks. Getting either one of these super cheap isn't a bad deal.
Syeguy (09:00 PM, August 31, 2016)
Ah yes rx 460 beats 750 ti in every aspect BUT nvidia wins because of 10w lower tdp, no nvidia bias in this site at all lol
Sr Baikmyr (07:34 AM, August 27, 2016)
huuuh???
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss