Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 950 |
Released August, 2016
AMD Radeon RX 460
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2016)Performance (overclocking, power)80%Quality (build, design, cooling)80%General Features (display outputs, etc)80%Bundle, Packaging & Software80%Value for Money90% Overall TweakTown Rating82% The Bottom Line: SAPPHIRE's new Nitro Radeon RX 460 4GB is priced at just $139, nailing the 1080p gaming scene.
VS
Released August, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!When looking at price/performance only, AMD's R9 285 should be on your shopping list as it offers much better performance at an excellent price of $170, a price that could be lower if you are in the market for used cards.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 460 vs 950 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 950GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,572.9 GFLOPS | More than 35% better floating-point performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,612 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better video composition score | 72.24 frames/s | vs | 30.84 frames/s | More than 2.2x better video composition score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 67.2 GTexel/s | vs | 49.2 GTexel/s | More than 35% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 1,653 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 90W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 5,206 | vs | 4,329 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 32.8 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | More than 70% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 44.05 | vs | 35.49 | Around 25% better fire strike factor score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 950
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 8 desktops with the Radeon RX 460, starting from $1,177
- 18 desktops with the GeForce GTX 950, starting from $1,098
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 460 | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 750 Ti vs 950 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 950 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 950 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 950 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| Pro 580 vs 1080 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 6 comments.
