Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon RX 460

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon RX 460

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 460

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 460

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 7x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 4,329 vs 118 Around 36.8x better PassMark score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,090 MHz vs 650 MHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 112 GB/s vs 8 GB/s 14x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,150.4 GFLOPS vs 104 GFLOPS Around 20.8x better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 500 MHz 3.5x higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 67.2 GTexel/s vs 5.2 GTexel/s Around 13x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 19.2 GPixel/s vs 2.6 GPixel/s Around 7.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 896 vs 80 816 more shading units
More texture mapping units 56 vs 8 48 more texture mapping units
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,488 vs 58 Around 43x better PassMark direct compute score
More compute units 14 vs 2 12 more compute units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better manhattan score 3,717.16 vs 603.85 Around 6.2x better manhattan score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of Radeon HD 6250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6250

Report a correction
Lower TDP 19W vs 75W 3.9x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 460 vs HD 6250

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
3,333.39

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 460
3,717.16

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus