GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 470 vs 960 among Desktop GPUs for under $200

Gaming

Radeon RX 470
9.1
GeForce GTX 960
8.0
GeForce GTX 760
7.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon RX 470
9.8
GeForce GTX 960
9.5
GeForce GTX 760
n.d.
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Radeon RX 470
9.4
GeForce GTX 960
7.0
GeForce GTX 760
n.d.
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon RX 470
6.9
GeForce GTX 960
6.1
GeForce GTX 760
5.0
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Radeon RX 470
5.1
GeForce GTX 960
5.1
GeForce GTX 760
5.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

Radeon RX 470
7.0
GeForce GTX 960
7.0
GeForce GTX 760
5.6
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.6

Overall Score

Radeon RX 470
8.6
GeForce GTX 960
7.4
GeForce GTX 760
6.4

Winner
AMD Radeon RX 470 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 470  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon RX 470

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Radeon RX 470
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 470

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 470

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 211.2 GB/s vs 112.2 GB/s Around 90% higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 7,363 vs 5,818 More than 25% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 4,940 GFLOPS vs 2,308.1 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher texture rate 154.4 GTexel/s vs 72.1 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
Significantly better T-Rex score 9.45 frames/s vs 3.92 frames/s Around 2.5x better T-Rex score
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,024 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 64 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,903 vs 3,040 Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 77 vs 58 Around 35% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 926 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,650 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 960

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 470
511.25 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 470
111.72 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 470
1,862.86 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 470
67.02
GeForce GTX 960
57.05

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 470
381.44
GeForce GTX 960
358.37

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon RX 470
20.28
GeForce GTX 960
20.14

Battlefield 4

Radeon RX 470
77
GeForce GTX 960
58

Crysis 3

Radeon RX 470
48.9
GeForce GTX 960
36.1

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Mehmet Akif Başar (11:49 AM, February 17, 2017)
ı use rx 470 and i5 6 generation = battlefield 1 87 FPS ultra
facial supremacy (02:57 AM, December 3, 2016)
It's odd to see that the 960 performs as well as it does given the fact that there's as much of a difference between the 960 and 470 as there is between the 1080 and the 470 specs wise, but numbers can deceive. The price, which i think is were it is to promote 1060 sales, has never been acceptable for the 960. LOL the 970 is cheaper. The 960, a card from the twilight zone???
pkl (12:12 AM, November 12, 2016)
Got to take rx 470.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss