GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 480 vs R9 FURY X among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

AMD Radeon RX 480 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 480  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 480

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 480

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 8,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 4,096 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 2,000 MHz vs 500 MHz 4x higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher clock speed 1,120 MHz vs 1,050 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 80 vs 37 Around 2.2x higher metro: last light framerate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,266 MHz vs 1,050 MHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 150W vs 275W More than 45% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Report a correction
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 256 bit 16x wider memory bus
Much higher memory bandwidth 512 GB/s vs 256 GB/s 2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better floating-point performance 8,602 GFLOPS vs 5,834 GFLOPS More than 45% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 268.8 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel/s More than 45% higher texture rate
Many more shading units 4,096 vs 2,304 1792 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 256 vs 144 112 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 67.2 GPixel/s vs 40.5 GPixel/s More than 65% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Many more compute units 64 vs 36 28 more compute units
Better cloud gate factor score 22.45 vs 21.43 Around 5% better cloud gate factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 480 vs R9 FURY X

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light


Showing 1 comment.
Um guys u should watch actual benchmarks the r9 fury x vs gtx 1080 the one I watched showed comparisons at 1080, 1440 and even 4k the gtx 1080 won but the Fury x ran Witcher 3 at 40 fps at 4K ULTRA!!! resolution The 970 hell the 1070 is a better comparison to the fury x this website is wrong the 970 can't run witcher 3 at 4k at a playable framerate and it only has 3.5 gb of vram not 4 but even if it had 8 It wouldn't beat the fury x not ever NVidia dick ridin going here THIS SITE SHOULD INCLUDE BENCHMARK VIDEOS TO PROVE WHAT'S ON HERE YOU TUBE IS A BETTER COMPARISON SITE!!!!
comments powered by Disqus