Winner
AMD Radeon RX 480
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 480 based on its noise and power.
See full details Radeon RX 480 vs R9 Nano |
Released June, 2016
AMD Radeon RX 480
- 1.1 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
8.4 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Jun, 2016)The Radeon RX 480 is what we have here to review right now, with the 8GB model featuring an 8GHz clock speed on the RAM, while the 4GB model is clocked down to 7GHz.
VS
Released August, 2015
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- 1 GHz
- 4 GB
8.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!VRM temperatures are good, thanks to the extra heatpipe providing extra cooling.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 480 vs R9 Nano among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | 4x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,120 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 150W | vs | 175W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much wider memory bus | 4,096 bit | vs | 256 bit | 16x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 8,192 GFLOPS | vs | 5,834 GFLOPS | More than 40% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 256 GTexel/s | vs | 182.3 GTexel/s | More than 40% higher texture rate | |||
| Many more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 2,304 | 1792 more shading units | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 144 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 64 GPixel/s | vs | 40.5 GPixel/s | Around 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| Many more compute units | 64 | vs | 36 | 28 more compute units | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 100 | vs | 82 | More than 20% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 480 vs R9 Nano
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Crysis 3
Metro: Last Light
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 580 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1070 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1080 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 570 vs RX 480 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| Pro 580 vs 1080 | ||
| | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
