GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 550 vs 750 Ti among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 550

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 550

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 5,400 MHz Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,020 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,183 MHz vs 1,085 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 550 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550
140.91 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550
34.18 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550
1,037.3 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
849.54 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550
323.41 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
568.19 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon RX 550

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


Showing 2 comments.
Agreed.I actually bought a Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX 550 last week.I consider this.It cost me 1,3k(my currency) and my friend bought a 750 ti last year(even though i told him to wait for new products to be released)he payed 2.5k.The 750 ti are faster but barely.I don't do much gaming as i study at the moment.So the price to performance ratio just aint there.Tbh the RX are a cute little card that can play most games.I don't follow reviews much as its better to test stuff yourself and come to a conclusion.It was never really ment for gaming but i tested bf 4 and rivals so far on it(1280x1024 everything on)max my display can handle and i never had a problem.It is true tho this card rocks on online gaming.I get around 100+ fps.Still need to clock the crap out of this card to see its max performance xD.Oh and the Pulse has a gpu clock on 1200 and memory on 1750(can push memory to 1900 just need to get my cooling setup properly still :D)
How can you give a rating for the rx 550 when you literally have no info on it? Weird.
comments powered by Disqus