Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050 |
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 560 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 7,217.94 | vs | 3,357.16 | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 2,611 GFLOPS | vs | 1,862 GFLOPS | More than 40% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better video composition score | 74 frames/s | vs | 32.65 frames/s | More than 2.2x better video composition score | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 81.6 GTexel/s | vs | 58.2 GTexel/s | More than 40% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,175 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 20.4 GPixel/s | More than 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,275 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 550 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
