Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 based on its compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050 |
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 560 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 2,611.2 GFLOPS | vs | 1,733.1 GFLOPS | More than 50% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 81.6 GTexel/s | vs | 54.2 GTexel/s | More than 50% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,175 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,723.16 | vs | 514.56 | Around 7.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 43.3 GPixel/s | vs | 20.4 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,275 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 2,934 | vs | 2,397 | More than 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 950 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $251 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
