Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- 1.3 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 560 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 2,611 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | More than 30% better floating-point performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly higher texture rate | 81.6 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 1,024 | vs | 768 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 1,175 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,757 | vs | 4,703 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | vs | 20.4 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 1,275 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,271 | vs | 2,532 | Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $316 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 460 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| RX Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $316 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $316 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
