Winner
AMD Radeon RX 560
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 560 based on its .
See full details Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce MX150 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 560 vs MX150 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,611 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | More than 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 81.6 GTexel/s | vs | 35.23 GTexel/s | More than 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 384 | 640 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 24 | 40 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better video composition score | 74 frames/s | vs | 39.77 frames/s | More than 85% better video composition score | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 20.4 GPixel/s | vs | 11.74 GPixel/s | Around 75% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 7,217.94 | vs | 3,351.4 | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,275 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
