Radeon RX 560 vs 550 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 560 vs RX 550 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon RX 560GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 4,703 | vs | 3,684 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 1,175 MHz | vs | 1,100 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,611 GFLOPS | vs | 1,211 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 81.6 GTexel/s | vs | 37.86 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 512 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Better video composition score | 74 frames/s | vs | 52.83 frames/s | More than 40% better video composition score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 7,217.94 | vs | 3,354.62 | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| More compute units | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many compute units | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,275 MHz | vs | 1,183 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,532 | vs | 1,730 | More than 45% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
