Winner
AMD Radeon RX 580
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 580 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
Released April, 2017
AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1.3 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
7.2 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (May, 2017)HBM2 is the memory technology that will be used on Radeon RX Vega, offering some great bandwidth numbers of up to 512GB/sec - but it'll be the memory footprint that makes the difference.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- 1.3 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon RX 580GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 6,175 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | More than 3x better floating-point performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better PassMark score | 7,781 | vs | 5,757 | More than 35% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 193 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 768 | Three times as many shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 144 | vs | 48 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 7,008 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 75.63 | vs | 51.07 | Around 50% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 893.97 mInteraction/s | vs | 662.21 mInteraction/s | Around 35% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 1,752 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,923 | vs | 3,271 | Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 185W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 560 | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
