Winner
AMD Radeon RX 580
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 580 based on its .
See full details Radeon RX 580 vs Pro WX 9100 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs Pro WX 9100 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 1,890 MHz | Around 4.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 945 MHz | More than 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 185W | vs | 300W | Around 40% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much more memory | 16,384 MB | vs | 8,192 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | vs | 256 GB/s | Around 90% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 12,288 GFLOPS | vs | 6,175 GFLOPS | Around 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 384 GTexel/s | vs | 193 GTexel/s | Around 2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 96 GPixel/s | vs | 42.88 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 2,304 | 1792 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 144 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 256 bit | 8x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly more compute units | 64 | vs | 36 | 28 more compute units | |||
| Significantly better face detection score | 173.63 mPixels/s | vs | 116.37 mPixels/s | Around 50% better face detection score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,500 MHz | vs | 1,340 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 580 vs Pro WX 9100
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs RX 480 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1080 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs RX 570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
