Winner
AMD Radeon R9 390
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 390 based on its benchmarks.
See full details Radeon RX 580 vs R9 390 |
Released April, 2017
AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1.3 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2017)So, if you have 16GB of RAM you could dedicate 4-6GB of it, so it would - in a way - combine with the 8GB of HBM2 for up to 14GB of VRAM.
VS
Released June, 2015
AMD Radeon R9 390
- 1 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
7.7 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!AMD's Hawaii graphics processor uses the GCN shader architecture.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs R9 390 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Radeon R9 390GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,257 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 6,000 MHz | Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 6,175 GFLOPS | vs | 5,120 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 193 GTexel/s | vs | 160 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 1,500 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 185W | vs | 275W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 64 GPixel/s | vs | 42.88 GPixel/s | Around 50% higher pixel rate | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 2,560 | vs | 2,304 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 160 | vs | 144 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 256 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
