GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs R9 Nano among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.4

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon RX 580 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 580  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX 580

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX 580

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 8,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 4,096 MB 2x more memory
Higher clock speed 1,257 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much higher memory clock speed 2,000 MHz vs 500 MHz 4x higher memory clock speed
Front view of Radeon R9 Nano

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Report a correction
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 256 bit 16x wider memory bus
Better floating-point performance 8,192 GFLOPS vs 6,175 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
Significantly more shading units 4,096 vs 2,304 1792 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 256 vs 144 112 more texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 256 GTexel/s vs 193 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Higher pixel rate 64 GPixel/s vs 42.88 GPixel/s Around 50% higher pixel rate
Significantly more compute units 64 vs 36 28 more compute units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX 580 vs R9 Nano

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus