Winner
AMD Radeon RX 580
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 580 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 580 vs 570 |
Released April, 2017
AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1.3 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
8.3 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Apr, 2017)This is one area I really don't like, is that SAPPHIRE requires a 6+8-pin PCIe power setup, and uses more power than NVIDIA's much faster GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs RX 570 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon RX 580GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,257 MHz | vs | 1,168 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 7,000 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | vs | 224 GB/s | Around 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 6,175 GFLOPS | vs | 5,095 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 193 GTexel/s | vs | 159.2 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,340 MHz | vs | 1,244 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 1,750 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 2,048 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 144 | vs | 128 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better face detection score | 129.98 mPixels/s | vs | 115.95 mPixels/s | More than 10% better face detection score | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,862 | vs | 3,251 | Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 120W | vs | 150W | 20% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
