Winner
AMD Radeon RX 580
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX 580 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon RX 580 vs 570 |
Released April, 2017
AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1.3 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
7.2 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (May, 2017)HBM2 is the memory technology that will be used on Radeon RX Vega, offering some great bandwidth numbers of up to 512GB/sec - but it'll be the memory footprint that makes the difference.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX 580 vs RX 570 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon RX 580GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,257 MHz | vs | 1,168 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 7,000 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 6,175 GFLOPS | vs | 5,095 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | vs | 224 GB/s | Around 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 193 GTexel/s | vs | 159.2 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 891.44 mInteraction/s | vs | 595.57 mInteraction/s | Around 50% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 1,750 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,340 MHz | vs | 1,244 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,923 | vs | 3,127 | More than 25% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 2,048 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 144 | vs | 128 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better fire strike factor score | 75.63 | vs | 70.44 | More than 5% better fire strike factor score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,718.68 | vs | 1,325.23 | More than 2.8x better manhattan score | |||
| Lower TDP | 120W | vs | 185W | More than 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
