Winner
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 based on its .
See full details Radeon RX Vega 56 vs 580 |
Released August, 2017
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- 1.2 GHz
- 8 GB
8.2 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2017)AMD is offering up a huge 10.5 TFLOPs of performance and mixed with 1080p/1440p 60FPS+ gaming with cheaper FreeSync displays, or one of the new Radeon Packs.
VS
Released April, 2017
AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1.3 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2017)So, if you have 16GB of RAM you could dedicate 4-6GB of it, so it would - in a way - combine with the 8GB of HBM2 for up to 14GB of VRAM.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of RX Vega 56 vs RX 580 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 10,544 GFLOPS | vs | 6,175 GFLOPS | More than 70% better floating-point performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | vs | 256 GB/s | More than 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 94.14 GPixel/s | vs | 42.88 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 329.5 GTexel/s | vs | 193 GTexel/s | More than 70% higher texture rate | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 256 bit | 8x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 2,304 | 1280 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 144 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| More compute units | 56 | vs | 36 | 20 more compute units | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,769.36 frames/s | vs | 1,014.15 frames/s | Around 75% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,471 MHz | vs | 1,340 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,257 MHz | vs | 1,156 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 185W | vs | 210W | More than 10% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon RX Vega 56 vs 580
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $286 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs RX 480 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs RX 570 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX Vega 56 vs 1070 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $286 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $286 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| $286 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1070 vs RX 580 | ||
