0 Comments
| Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs 580 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | vs | 256 GB/s | More than 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better floating-point performance | 10,215 GFLOPS | vs | 6,175 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 319.2 GTexel/s | vs | 193 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher pixel rate | 79.81 GPixel/s | vs | 42.88 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 2,304 | 1792 more shading units | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 144 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 256 bit | 8x wider memory bus | |||
Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Significantly more compute units | 64 | vs | 36 | 28 more compute units | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,257 MHz | vs | 1,156 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,340 MHz | vs | 1,247 MHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 185W | vs | 250W | More than 25% lower TDP |
Features Key features of the Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs 580
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
409.6 GB/s
Radeon RX 580
256 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
79.81 GPixel/s
Radeon RX 580
42.88 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
319.2 GTexel/s
Radeon RX 580
193 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
10,215 GFLOPS
Radeon RX 580
6,175 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
4,096
Radeon RX 580
2,304
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Radeon RX 580
144
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | vs | 580 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | AMD | |
GPU name | Vega 10 | Polaris 20 | |
Clock speed | 1,156 MHz | 1,257 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,247 MHz | 1,340 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 4,096 | 2,304 | |
Texture mapping units | 256 | 144 | |
Render output processors | 64 | 32 | |
Compute units | 64 | 36 | |
Pixel rate | 79.81 GPixel/s | 42.88 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 319.2 GTexel/s | 193 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 10,215 GFLOPS | 6,175 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | vs | 580 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,600 MHz | 8,000 MHz | |
Memory bus | 2,048 bit | 256 bit | |
Memory | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 256 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 250W | 185W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs RX 480 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 1080 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs RX 570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||