Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX Vega 64

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 12,665 GFLOPS vs 11,340 GFLOPS More than 10% better floating-point performance
Significantly wider memory bus 2,048 bit vs 352 bit More than 5.8x wider memory bus
Higher texture rate 395.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel/s More than 10% higher texture rate
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,584 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 224 32 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 11,008 MHz vs 1,890 MHz More than 5.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,480 MHz vs 1,247 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
More memory 11,264 MB vs 8,192 MB Around 40% more memory
Higher pixel rate 139.2 GPixel/s vs 98.94 GPixel/s More than 40% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 88 vs 64 24 more render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,376 MHz vs 945 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 250W vs 295W More than 15% lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon RX Vega 64  vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

Radeon RX Vega 64
483.8 GB/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
484.4 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon RX Vega 64
98.94 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
139.2 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon RX Vega 64
395.8 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
354.4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon RX Vega 64
12,665 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
11,340 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon RX Vega 64  vs
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Vega 10 GP102
Clock speed 1,247 MHz 1,480 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,546 MHz 1,582 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Shading units 4,096 3,584
Texture mapping units 256 224
Render output processors 64 88
Pixel rate 98.94 GPixel/s 139.2 GPixel/s
Texture rate 395.8 GTexel/s 354.4 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 12,665 GFLOPS 11,340 GFLOPS


Radeon RX Vega 64  vs
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 
Memory clock speed 945 MHz 1,376 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 1,890 MHz 11,008 MHz
Memory bus 2,048 bit 352 bit
Memory 8,192 MB 11,264 MB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s 484.4 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 295W 250W


Showing 25 comments.
This is the age old conflict. Chevy vs. Ford. Everyone grows up loving one or the other and can find reasons that it dominates. Both these cards are sick. Truly out of reach for most Family having PC elitists.
or don't talk about things you have no understanding of. if your technical knowledge ends at random numbers you see on the screen don't comment on it. the RX vega has a much larger bus width than the 1080 which makes them /almost/ identical in that aspect. if you have 1 lane road with the speed limit of 120 mph vs a 4 lane road with a speed limit of 60 mph you're moving more traffic through the 4 lane road even though it's a slower speed and let me stop you before you try and go and write up an angry rebuttal with "ITS STILL FASTER IN PERFORMANCE" this direct line of comments is about memory not about the overall performance of the gpu.
Last I checked this was a comparison of the 1080ti wasn't it? All these comments are back and forth, using the 1080 in the their examples for price and the 1080ti for performance. Who is ignorant now peeps? Talk about fucking morons. Came in the comments to research and see if I can get some info since I don't tilt to either side and all I see is fanboys crying.
True, but he didn't say 1080ti, he said 1080. There's a big difference between the two, namely the 1080 is 8gb where the 1080ti is 11gb. Meanwhile the vega 64 also has only 8gb of vram. So the VEGA 64 does with 8gb what the 1080ti needs 11gb to do.
Idiot Vulkan is just a successor to OpenGL it has nothing to do with "Windoze" good luck running your "Vulkan" in DOS, IDIOT!
Like they say:"ignorance is bliss."
LOL the Vega is on par with mining compared to the 1080ti... Try again.
Not today it isn't. The Vulcan 64 is the same price or less expensive on the market than the GTX 1080.
They perform just fine, your making it sound as if AMD cards cant run games at all. Sure, Vegas are very expensive and a 1080 would be a better choice for gaming but Vega 64 is still a very fast card.
The Vega 64 is great for gaming. Its not the best, but you will not be disappointed on the performance side of things.
Correct Michael. And on the Vulcan software stack Vega 64 outperforms the Ti version in everything as well. And it is less $$ than the 1080Ti.
Radeon was pretty dumb with marketing there. While I prefer this GPU for professional work even to the Titan Xp (since those 12TFlops mean a lot), I don't really think this was supposed to be marketed as a gaming GPU, but a Proffesional/Gaming GPU.
IF the price comes down on the rx vega 64, I will definitely consider it. I suspect that the miners are going to buy up the market again. I'm very interested to see how it improves as the drivers are tweeked. In the mean time... I'll stick with my gtx.
I doubt the average gamer would hate the rx vega.... They would be happy to have either card!
You are an idiot my friend. For you, don't know the difference between a GTX 1080 & a GTX 1080Ti ...
Vega 64 is half the price my friend. Google before you say something silly..
The prices I have looked at show the GTX 1080 ti to be about $100 more expensive. That in itself is not a big deal. What is a huge deal is if you want to go 4k and have Gsync that costs about $900 for the monitor. As opposed to the lower price on the Vega Costco has a 4K free sync monitor for $299. That my friend is a big deal since that $600 monitor difference can be in a second Vega.
When was the last time Nvidia made a CPU lol...
1080ti is for gaylords.
By all means, buy my GTX 1080 if you love it so much:
Yes, it did looks stunning, same to the gtx 1080, because u have been an amd fanboy so much, u didnt even realize the gtx 1080 can do the same thing.
in your dreams, idiot. Also its worth much more,than GTX 1080
is weird, seems better to buy a radeon pro duo instead a VEGA, really weird
The GTX 1080 only gets about what, 22mh/s mining? Vega 64 gets 34mh/s. And No Man's Sky looks totally stunning in 4k.
comments powered by Disqus