GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Vega Frontier vs TITAN Z among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Vega Frontier

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,382 MHz vs 705 MHz More than 95% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 10,659 vs 7,752 Around 40% better PassMark score
More memory 16,384 MB vs 12,288 MB Around 35% more memory
Better floating-point performance 13,107 GFLOPS vs 10,092 GFLOPS Around 30% better floating-point performance
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,600 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 85% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better particle simulation score 1,591.1 mInteraction/s vs 844.6 mInteraction/s Around 90% better particle simulation score
Much better PassMark direct compute score 7,371 vs 3,418 Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Much wider memory bus 2,048 bit vs 768 bit Around 2.8x wider memory bus
Lower TDP 300W vs 375W 20% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 1,890 MHz Around 3.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 672 GB/s vs 483.8 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Many more texture mapping units 480 vs 256 224 more texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 5,760 vs 4,096 1664 more shading units
Significantly more render output processors 96 vs 64 32 more render output processors
Much higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 945 MHz More than 85% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Vega Frontier vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
1,415.99 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
332.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
191.27 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
79.68 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
3,508.02 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1,933.42 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
1,591.1 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
844.6 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
17.79 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.65 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Vega Frontier
181.46 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
83.61 frames/s

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus