Winner
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon Vega Frontier vs RX 460 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
9.4 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
AMD Radeon Vega FrontierGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much more memory | 16,384 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 8x more memory | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 10,659 | vs | 4,329 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better floating-point performance | 13,107 GFLOPS | vs | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | More than 6x better floating-point performance | |||
Much higher memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | vs | 112 GB/s | More than 4.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Much higher texture rate | 409.6 GTexel/s | vs | 67.2 GTexel/s | More than 6x higher texture rate | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,382 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher pixel rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | More than 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Many more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 896 | 3200 more shading units | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 56 | 200 more texture mapping units | |||
Much better particle simulation score | 1,591.1 mInteraction/s | vs | 431.51 mInteraction/s | Around 3.8x better particle simulation score | |||
Many more render output processors | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more render output processors | |||
Many more compute units | 64 | vs | 14 | 50 more compute units | |||
Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 128 bit | 16x wider memory bus | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 7,371 | vs | 2,488 | Around 3x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,600 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 1,890 MHz | Around 3.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 945 MHz | More than 85% higher memory clock speed | |||
Much lower TDP | 75W | vs | 300W | 4x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
RX 460 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs 950 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs RX 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 460 vs RX 560 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||