Winner
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon Vega Frontier vs RX 460 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Vega Frontier vs RX 460 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon Vega FrontierGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more memory | 16,384 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 8x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better PassMark score | 10,659 | vs | 4,329 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 13,107 GFLOPS | vs | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | More than 6x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | vs | 112 GB/s | More than 4.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 409.6 GTexel/s | vs | 67.2 GTexel/s | More than 6x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,382 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | vs | 19.2 GPixel/s | More than 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Many more shading units | 4,096 | vs | 896 | 3200 more shading units | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 56 | 200 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much better particle simulation score | 1,591.1 mInteraction/s | vs | 431.51 mInteraction/s | Around 3.8x better particle simulation score | |||
| Many more render output processors | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more render output processors | |||
| Many more compute units | 64 | vs | 14 | 50 more compute units | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 128 bit | 16x wider memory bus | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 7,371 | vs | 2,488 | Around 3x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,600 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 1,890 MHz | Around 3.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 945 MHz | More than 85% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Much lower TDP | 75W | vs | 300W | 4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Vega Frontier vs RX 460
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| RX 460 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs 950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs RX 550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 460 vs RX 560 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
