Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon X1050

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon X1050

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 400 MHz vs 344 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of Radeon 3100 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon 3100 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3100 IGP vs the X1050.

Features Key features of the Radeon X1050  vs 3100 IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon X1050
3.2 GPixel/s
Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon X1050
3.2 GTexel/s
Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GTexel/s

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon X1050  vs
3100 IGP 
GPU brand ATI ATi
GPU name RV410 RS780C
Clock speed 400 MHz 344 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon X1050  vs
3100 IGP 
Texture mapping units 8 4
Render output processors 8 4
Pixel rate 3.2 GPixel/s 1.38 GPixel/s
Texture rate 3.2 GTexel/s 1.38 GTexel/s


comments powered by Disqus