Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon X1050

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon X1050

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of Radeon HD 5450 Passive

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5450 Passive

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 400 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz 2x higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon X1050 vs HD 5450 Passive

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Radeon X1050  vs HD 5450 Passive 

effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon X1050
3.2 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 5450 Passive
2.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon X1050
3.2 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 5450 Passive
5.2 GTexel/s

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers


comments powered by Disqus