Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 9800.

Front view of GeForce GT 9800

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 600 MHz vs 500 MHz 20% higher clock speed
More texture mapping units 56 vs 4 52 more texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 33.6 GTexel/s vs 2 GTexel/s More than 16.8x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Slightly higher pixel rate 9.6 GPixel/s vs 2 GPixel/s More than 4.8x higher pixel rate

Features Key features of the Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP  vs GeForce GT 9800 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 9800
9.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 9800
33.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9800 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS780C G92
Clock speed 500 MHz 600 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9800 
Shading units 40 112
Texture mapping units 4 56
Render output processors 4 16
Pixel rate 2 GPixel/s 9.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 2 GTexel/s 33.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 40 GFLOPS 336 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus