|
 |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce 305M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce 305M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | GT218 |
| Market | Laptop |
| Clock speed | 525 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
raw performance
| Shading units | 16 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 8 |
| Render output processors | 4 |
| Pixel rate | 2.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 4.2 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 36.8 GFLOPS |
memory
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz |
| Memory bus | 64 bit |
| Memory | 512 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB/s |
noise and power
| TDP | 14W |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 840M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 820M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 205
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 710M
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
