|
 |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce 315M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce 315M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | GT218 |
| Market | Laptop |
| Clock speed | 606 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
raw performance
| Shading units | 16 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 8 |
| Render output processors | 4 |
| Pixel rate | 2.42 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 4.85 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 38.78 GFLOPS |
memory
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,600 MHz |
| Memory bus | 64 bit |
| Memory | 512 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s |
noise and power
| TDP | 14W |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce 940M
|
 | ATi Radeon HD 3870 X2
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
|
 | ASUS GeForce GT 8800
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 9800
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 920M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 710
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
