|
| 5.7 Out of 10 |  |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce 320M
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the GeForce 320M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | MCP89 |
| Clock speed | 450 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
noise and power
| TDP | 23W |
|---|
raw performance
| Shading units | 48 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 16 |
| Render output processors | 8 |
| Pixel rate | 3.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 7.2 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 91.2 GFLOPS |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Colorful GeForce GTX 650
|
 | ASUS GeForce GT 8800
|
 | Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile
|
 | ATi Radeon HD 4870
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT
|
 | ATi Mobility Radeon HD 4650
|
 | ATi Radeon HD 5450
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
