|
| 5.7 Out of 10 |  |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce 320M
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the GeForce 320M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | MCP89 |
| Clock speed | 450 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
noise and power
| TDP | 23W |
|---|
raw performance
| Shading units | 48 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 16 |
| Render output processors | 8 |
| Pixel rate | 3.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 7.2 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 91.2 GFLOPS |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | |
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
|
 | ATi Radeon HD 2400
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 940MX
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
|
 | Colorful GeForce GTX 650
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
