0 Comments
|
|
5.7 Out of 10 | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce 320M
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the GeForce 320M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
GPU brand | Nvidia |
---|---|
GPU name | MCP89 |
Clock speed | 450 MHz |
Is dual GPU | No |
Reference card | None |
noise and power
TDP | 23W |
---|
raw performance
Shading units | 48 |
---|---|
Texture mapping units | 16 |
Render output processors | 8 |
Pixel rate | 3.6 GPixel/s |
Texture rate | 7.2 GTexel/s |
Floating-point performance | 91.2 GFLOPS |

Follow us
Compare
Competitors
Compare | AMD Radeon Pro 560
|
Compare | Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
|
Compare | Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
|
Compare | Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
|
Compare | Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT
|
Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6470M
|
Compare | Nvidia GeForce GT 220
|
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||