|
|
Features Key features of the GeForce 9400M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | C79MX |
| Clock speed | 580 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
noise and power
| TDP | 12W |
|---|
raw performance
| Shading units | 16 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 8 |
| Render output processors | 4 |
| Pixel rate | 2.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 4.64 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 44.8 GFLOPS |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce 320M Mac
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 330M Mac
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 9400
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 120 Mac
|
 | ATi Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
|
Other GeForce 9400Ms
 | Nvidia GeForce 9400M
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
