|
|
Features Key features of the GeForce 9400M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | C79MX |
| Clock speed | 580 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
noise and power
| TDP | 12W |
|---|
raw performance
| Shading units | 16 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 8 |
| Render output processors | 4 |
| Pixel rate | 2.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 4.64 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 44.8 GFLOPS |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce 320M Mac
|
 | ZOTAC GeForce GTS 250
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 940M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 9400M G
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 330M Mac
|
Other GeForce 9400Ms
 | Nvidia GeForce 9400M
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
