GeForce G102M 

GP100's ideal 1 : 2 : 4 FP64 : FP32 : FP16 ratio is inefficient for gaming.

Either GP100 still has a lot of headroom, and will take the crown on a second generation of Pascal, or GP102 performs equivalent (or better) under gaming scenarios, clearly dividing the market between the two chips.

Placement and scaling of UI elements is crucial as menus that are unreadable or icons and indicators that are at the far corners of the 1st and 3rd monitor will make playing the game a frustrating experience.

The latest iteration of Wolfenstein, The New Order is a well made game with what I consider to be a well above average ability to draw me into playing it.

Depending on the game, video settings, and GPU speed, a scene may intermittently dip through this dead band and therefore introduce an intermittent latency, which would be worst (7 msec) at just below 30 FPS.

Bouncing various GPU heavy games I found a batch of settings for Metro Last Light that dipped through the theoretical 'dead band' several times within the same benchmark session.

My short time with the NVIDIA G-Sync prototype display has been truly impressive, and getting some play time in with Battlefield 4, Crysis 3, Bioshock Infinite and even some good old Battlefield 3 was awesome.

Comparing G-Sync to V-Sync enabled setups is a little bit more complicated because you don't have the painfully obvious visual tearing on your screen the majority of the time.