|
 |
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | GT200 B3 |
| Market | Desktop |
| Clock speed | 650 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 576 MHz 896 MB |
raw performance
| Shading units | 216 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 72 |
| Render output processors | 28 |
| Pixel rate | 18.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 46.8 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 604.8 GFLOPS |
memory
| Memory clock speed | 1,050 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 2,100 MHz |
| Memory bus | 448 bit |
| Memory | 896 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 117.6 GB/s |
noise and power
| TDP | 171W |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | |
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 9600
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
|
 | |
 | ASUS GeForce GT 8800
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 680
|
Other GeForce GTX 260 Core 216s
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
|
 | EVGA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 1.75 GB
|
 | ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Matrix GTX 260
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 570 | ||
