|
| 4.9 Out of 10 |  |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce GTX 260M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu
| GPU brand | Nvidia |
|---|---|
| GPU name | G92 |
| Market | Laptop |
| Clock speed | 550 MHz |
| Is dual GPU | No |
| Reference card | None |
raw performance
| Shading units | 112 |
|---|---|
| Texture mapping units | 56 |
| Render output processors | 16 |
| Pixel rate | 8.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 30.8 GTexel/s |
| Floating-point performance | 308 GFLOPS |
memory
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz |
|---|---|
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,900 MHz |
| Memory bus | 256 bit |
| Memory | 1,024 MB |
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.8 GB/s |
noise and power
| TDP | 65W |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 940M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 840M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce 920M
|
 | Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
|
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
