GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 

Released February, 2014
  • 889 MHz
  • 6 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10

We've got some massive gains and just overall some really playable numbers with an 81 FPS minimum being seen at even the highest resolution.
by Shawn-Baker (Apr, 2013)
ORNL will have to rely on process node shrinks and improvements in architectural efficiency, on both CPU and GPU fronts, to deliver the next 10x performance increase.
by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Oct, 2012)

GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK among Desktop GPUs over $400

Gaming

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
7.9
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
7.2
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
6.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
5.0
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
6.7
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
6.9

Benchmarks Real world tests of the GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
181.95 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
789.24 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
321.67 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
63.71 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
224 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
85.57 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
1,842.91 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2,588.19 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2,204.46 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
3,357.65

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
3,716.73

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
76.73

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
461.6

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
24.1

In The News From around the web

It's still pretty unbelievable that we have this type of power right now on 28nm technology - incredible fast, but very efficient video cards with the possibilities really opening up with 4-way SLI and 4K and beyond.
As you can see, the Titan X in SLI can be pretty damn loud when those fans are pumping away at 100%, but during our BF4 usage, they didn't get too loud - pushing out a little less noise than the fans do at a manual 50.
Performance (including Overclocking w/a)95%Quality including Design and Build95%General Features95%Bundle and Packaging90%Value for Money90% Overall TweakTown Rating93% The Bottom Line: NVIDIA regains control of the fastest single GPU in the world with the GeForce GTX Titan X. Unparalleled performance at high resolutions, with the Maxwell architecture continuing to shine in the GM200 core.
BioShock Infinite at 1440p wasn't as impressive, but we still have some great gains on the GTX Titan X. The GM200-powered card beat the overclocked R9 290X 8GB by 26%, while it beat the GTX 980 by 15.
4
Mar

NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX Titan X

by Ryan Smith |
www.anandtech.com
NVIDIA will be pairing it with 12GB VRAM – indicating a 384-bit memory bus – and it will once again be using NVIDIA’s excellent metal cooler and shroud, originally introduced on the original GTX Titan.
The DiGi+ design on the motherboard includes several high-quality components such as the DR.MOS MOSFETs, capacitors with the ability to operate up to 12000 hours, ProCool power connectors and thermal chokes.
ASUS’s high-performance and workstation grade, X99-E WS motherboard has been unveiled prior to its launch tomorrow.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GPU brand Nvidia
GPU name GK110B
Market Desktop
Clock speed 889 MHz
Turbo clock speed 980 MHz
Is dual GPU No
Reference card None

raw performance

Shading units 2,880
Texture mapping units 240
Render output processors 48
Pixel rate 53.3 GPixel/s
Texture rate 213.4 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 5,121 GFLOPS

memory

Memory clock speed 1,750 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz
Memory bus 384 bit
Memory 6,144 MB
Memory type GDDR5

noise and power

TDP 250W
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
not entirely sure about this, but i do know that if you have a 3xsli setup and triple monitor setup with 1 gpu for each monitor you get the full 12gb by utilizing 4gb per monitor.
What you don't get is that if you SLI two NVIDIA cards, you only are able to use the amount of VRAM that a SINGLE card has. For example, a 4 GB GDDR5 GTX 980. If you SLI even four of them, you are only able to use 4 GB of VRAM. The same doesn't go for AMD, I don't think.
My apologies, you may be correct in that regard. I did not think that it was, but now that I look, I cannot find any evidence to the contrary. I believe that I may have made the mistake due to the fact that the gtx 690 (the highest end 6xx series card) has two gpu's.
Isn't 780 Ti a single gpu?
Unfortunately, I fear that in the interest of future proofing one's setup 6 Gbs of vram may be preferred. Already we're seeing games, like Watch Dogs, that are vram destroyers. If you are running 4k or multi-monitor I fear that this is especially true. The other consideration that you fail to mention is that the 780 Ti is a dual gpu card, whereas the Titan Black has only one. Meaning that hypothetically you could SLI 4 Titan Blacks, but only 2 780 Ti's.
I ordered my Titan Black Superclocked today!
It costs a premium for the extra 3GB over a 780 Ti (not complaining or anything). For gaming, I'd consider SLI'ing two 780 Ti's (or lower) for multi-monitor setups. The main factor is whether one needs the extra vram or not.
comments powered by Disqus